1 Apr
2009
1 Apr
'09
3:14 p.m.
Max wrote:
here is the same thing with pix_multiimage instead. it will crash pd a little bit later than the version with pix_image.
i guess it is crashing right after you try loading 1000000 images (or so) into RAM. what do you expect? (if you look carefully, you might also notice that [pix_write] gradually fills up your harddisk. this is no bug either ;-))
or am i missing something obvious (it seems so, as i cannot reproduce the memleak you report with [pix_image] either).
fmgas.dr. IOhannes