On 01.03.21 04:13, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Em dom., 28 de fev. de 2021 às 16:20, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com mailto:porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
I'm thinking about creating a variant of delread/write~ for ELSE with this "freeze" functionality. But maybe we can request to add it to vanilla.
maybe this is best for the pd-dev list, but here I go.
In my design choice for a variation of delread/write, I think it could be given a unique delay name when a delay write object is not given a delay line argument. This name could then be sent via an outlet to a read object. This looks like how things work for MAX's tapin~/tapout~ and I confess I'm taking it as a model.
Now, big question, can I force an order of execution with such a connection? Would it have to be a signal connection only?
I think adding that freeze option to delay would be fantastic and even more so when it gets Pd's functionality en par with the Max/MSP counterparts.
What I also would like to see is a tabwrite~-like object that uses an array to write to, but each new sample gets pushed to the next index of the array when a new one is added.
m.