--- On Tue, 3/8/11, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external? To: pd-list@iem.at Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 9:51 AM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-03-08 06:34, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I think a better question would be put to Miller or
Hans, or the other
admins-- can someone please explain how the patch
review process works?
it's very simple: each patch is assigned to a person (well, let's assume it is).
Ok, then the problem is equally simple: the patch in question is not currently assigned to anyone. Could someone choose the "millerpuckette" option on the tracker for patch id #3170987, please?
whenever the assignee feels like it, they would browse to sf.net and have a look at the patches that are assigned to them (and probably at patches that are not assigned to them, though it seems that they should) if they have a good they, they eventually apply a given patch (considering they like how it is done), fix a given bug (considering they find a way to do it) or just close an invalid report.
there is an agreement, that only miller manages the core Pd. (hence there are a lot of patches in the tracker submitted by hans or me or other "admins")
Not only is the patch in question is now over a month
old with no signs
of the review having begun, but it was submitted to
the tracker in direct
response to a user's request for the feature. If
there's a problem
with it there should at least be a relevant comment by
this point.
indeed.
here comes the usual rant (you can safely skip it, if not in the mood): feel free to employ one (or several) of the people responsible for fixing your problems. then you can define the review process (e.g. that people have to react on an issue within a minimum time). you could even press them into accepting a given patch (or to come up with an alternative solution) since you are interested in getting a feature into core Pd, i suggest to hire miller. in the meantime you might have to accept that people have dynamic priorities which might not overlap with yours. end of the usual rant.
mfgasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk117h4ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTWkwCfVLcnqV/EGjPTwBB/1axkjWqO mbcAoJRpq/abzebKGhZ5gJKPNz1EDRG1 =7Tww -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list