On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 00:05 +0200, cyrille henry wrote:
i can understand that tabread4~ minimise the error when the table is large (when you play it faster than the original speed). but with a small table, or when you play it slower, the first derivative discontinuity create lot's of high frequency.
hm... several times i had the impression, i used [tabread~] instead of [tabread4~] because of the high frequencies, that are audible, even if the sample is played very slowly. i assume, those come from the discontinuites you mentioned. but when i compared to [tabread~], there was definitely a huge difference. however, just out of curiosity, i wonder, whether a different algorithm is optimal for playing faster than original than for playing slower.
i am looking forward to check your classes.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de