PSPunch wrote:
I thought the dgemhead and repeat methods were just a matter of preference. If one is trendy and the other out dated, I guess I can just drop the one said to be less efficient.
as far as I understand it, there are now 3 methods:
1: double [gemhead] 2: [repeat] 3: [until] with [gemlist]
1 requires only Gem, but is least efficient 2 requires Gem and zexy, but is most efficient 3 requires only Gem, but Gem newer than a certain version 3 is very close to 2 in efficiency
They may also have different behaviour, I think (1) implies a built-in [separator] which may or may not be what you want?
Please correct this if I'm wrong!
Claude