hi,
CK wrote: ...
maybe it is time to revive pd-lib? Maybe under a new name and outside of sourceforge?
why not use the name and location ?
well, I really meant ``_maybe_ it would be better to make a change'', because
. I think it somehow does not work sourceforge way:
pd-lib.sourceforge.net/status.html: Last Update: May 10, 2000
. I do not like the name. It suggests being ``the pd library''...
Just recently I have made comb~ and allpass~ clones needed for flanging/phasing fx with sub-blocksize delays. I coded them from scratch, because the versions in pd-lib cannot be modulated.
where ?
I prefer not to release untested code, sorry... Esp. if this would mean starting a new project (which is not vital: after all, vd~ is sufficient in most cases).
And, from user's pov, the more (distributed) code to collect, the less time is left for music...
But I would happily see it part of a larger context.
Krzysztof