On Sun, 01 Jul 2007, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:29:40PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Anyway, seriously, if you wanted [unpost] as an external for Miller's pd, you can't, because Miller rejected the sys_printhook patch in 2004.
Maybe it would go in now that there is this excellent concrete example of being able to catch and process errors in-patch.
If it makes sense to you that excellent concrete examples can push new features into pd, I cannot help your case. It doesn't work that way.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:51:21AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
It's very possible for you to transfer the features. You only have to rewrite the code the way that Miller wants them to be written like.
So why don't more people do that? Rewrite the code the way [they think] Miller wants instead of forking their own incompatible version of Pd?
Best,
Chris.