On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Ivan Franco wrote:
On Sep 8, 2004, at 5:48 PM, chris clepper wrote:
Also, speaking just for myself, I have no interest whatsoever in duplicating features from Nato, Jitter or other software at this point. I find those two Max video systems flawed in both technical and conceptual design,
It's not about copying other features. [...] Sorry for the following comment but I'm a bit bothered about how people react when we talk about Max or Nato or Jitter or whatever software similar to PD/GEM/etc... I'm really supportive about opensource and I think it's the way to go, but I must mention something that seems good/practical, in my point of view, in those softwares. Not comparing or asking for features. Just commenting, since we all want GEM to grow to be more....
Some references for you:
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?NotInventedHere http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here http://www.ecotopia.com/webpress/nih.htm
And it's not because it is typically about corporations and research centres, that it can't apply to organisms, teams, and independent programmers too.
ttyl
Mathieu Bouchard http://artengine.ca/matju