On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:34 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:43 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
.pd_darwin is still supported for legacy externals.
Pd-extended only builds objects using .pd_darwin as an extension.
It works fine for i386, PowerPC, and universal binaries.but then, pd-extended _is_ a legacy project (no harm intended from
my side; there is nothing wrong with that)once Pd-extended grows to 0.41, chances are high that it will
support the .d_fat idiom too. in the meantime, we can argue whether it was a good idea to have
different suffixes for different OS's _and_ architectures (but why
should we?)
Actually, Pd-extended will stick to .pd_darwin as the default unless
someone else really wants to change it. .d_fat was introducted in
0.40, and the current Pd-extended still uses .pd_darwin.
.hc
Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic