Re: [PD] delay lines

Nothing specific, but the current implemtnation has 4 wraparound points (which assumes that interpolation goes up to 4 points) -- seems unnecessarily arbitrary to me.

cheers M

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:34:34PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Miller Puckette wrote:

...

I thought about this for quite some time, but couldn't see that unifying the two would bring enough benefit to be worth it. In particular, the particular way wraparound is handled in delay lines might change with the iplementation, but making the actual storage visible as a table would lock us into one implementation.

Which other implementation(s) did you have in mind ?

---

| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC