Please don't interprete what I'm gonna say as sarchastic or offensive to whom wrote the above sentence (which however has been suggested by more than one person). Just take it as a general and (hopefully) constructive discussion about PD issues...
No offense taken. But since I have neither skills nor time to get involved in PD development, I have to stay focused on certain things.
Yes of course. I didn't mean to criticize your suggestion: I meant to "criticize PD" that makes that suggestion necessary.
Of course that IS a valid workaround in a lot of situations where the use of abstractions is not very extensive; it is just not feasible when you're developing some complex large scale application that you need also to mantain or further develop in the future.
I do very much appreciate workarounds, and often need them too. I just think that the existence of a workaround is not an "excuse" to underestimate the importance of an issue - especially when the workaround only applies to a restricted range of cases.
Bye m.