On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 06:56:00PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I don't recall why Jamie wants to have a [getpatchname], but there are possible uses of [getpatchname] which aren't doable by [namecanvas], and vice-versa.
Also, I heard something once about [namecanvas] being deprecated. ;)
And your point is?
If I want to do real work with canvases, I don't care what Miller's delusions are, I just use freaking deprecated [namecanvas], and if Miller ever removes freaking deprecated [namecanvas] from Pd, I have several ways out, like using the [bindpatcher] extern which does exactly the same, or hack [namecanvas] back into the pd source, or turn [namecanvas] into an extern, or just not upgrade Pd.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada