18 Jan
2006
18 Jan
'06
4:14 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:32:11AM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, vincent rioux wrote:
we probably should not go that far into details,
which details are superfluous?
Those which had already been covered in previous posts.
I posted about PiDiP on pd-list as I realized that most people didn't even know of PiDiP's license problems because it only had been discussed on pd-dev and pd-ot. It might all be superfluous to your inbox, but there are many other people reading pd-list.
You are quite correct, and if your post was purely to help out people who might get stuck in a quagmire of licensing issues, I offer my apologies.
Best regards,
Chris.
chris@mccormick.cx http://mccormick.cx