is this just me, or why are Andys emails always in the future ? my date is atm: Tue Dec 11 19:03:36 CET 2007
.andre
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 04:21 +0000, Andy Farnell wrote:
Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:07:17 +0100 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org wrote:
Hi,
attached is some stretched phasor~ fun for your classic synthesis methods class: an implementation of the VOSIM algorithm for speech synthesis etc. as invented by Kaegi/Templaars.
My implementation is almost correct, but has a slight bug, which you can see if you set M and T to the values indicated by message boxes, set N to 2 or 3 and and set b to be larger than 0. Then the step function which scales the amplitude of the sin^2 pulses starts irregularily. I'm quite sure this comes from the way I use [samphold~] inside [vosim~] as it sometimes samples the wrong value. However I don't yet know of a proper workaround. (One workaround would be to just omit the samhold-step, but the result would not be VOSIM according to the textbooks.)
So anybody with a good idea?
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__