Since you are not following the Pd-extended packaging (i.e. Gem from git rather than the pd-extended/0.43 branch), I think it makes more sense if you package each library individually. That is made much easier by the Library Template:
https://puredata.info/docs/developer/LibraryTemplate/
It seems there is already an ArchTemplate there. In Debian, that's how we are packaging things, you can see all the packages listed here, they all start with pd-*
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.al...
.hc
On 10/30/2012 08:26 PM, Fero Kiraly wrote:
Because of Hans (thanks Hans) suggestion I did a NO SVN pkgbild. It should be the REAL latest version of pd-extended 0.43-x here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44798
it was born from: https://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/branches/pd-extended... ------- the latest pd-extended 0.43.x git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem ------- the latest GEM git://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pure-data/pd-extended.git ------- the latest pd-extended core
- mime types (it depends now on hicolor-icon-theme)
or am I wrong about the latest sources ??
I have a question again. On aur.archlinux.org it is shown as Pure Data Extended 0.43-1 version, BUT IT IS 0.43-4 NOW. Where I did mistake in PKGBUILD ? cheers
paum
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list