Some additional personal understanding:
I haven't looked it up, but as far i remember <m_pd.h> is searched
for standard paths and -I defined paths, whereas "m_pd.h" is searched
for those plus the source folder.
Otherwise many of my programs would probably not work....
greetings, Thomas
Am 05.09.2007 um 09:23 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
martin.peach@sympatico.ca wrote:
/tmp/ccuN3zCm.o: In function
helloworld_bang': helloworld.c:(.text+0xe): undefined reference topost'the given error was a linker error rather than a compiler error.
You need to #include <m_pd.h> in the source file. If you have #include "m_pd.h" then m_pd.h has to be in the same
directory as the source file.not quite true.
in my understanding "m_pd.h" will be searched for in all paths
given via the "-I" compiler-flag, whereas <m_pd.h> will only be searched for in "standard" paths.some stats: a quick search in the externals-folder of the CVS
revealed: "m_pd.h" is uncluded 889 times <m_pd.h> is included 107 timesi doubt that all of the 889 occurences of "m_pd.h" have the m_pd.h in the same directory as the source files.
fgmasdr. IOhannes
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list