23 Jul
2003
23 Jul
'03
9:19 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Le 23 Juillet 2003 14:11, Matthew Allen a écrit :
They both do the same thing, I think the second one is a little cleaner and easier to read/figure out what is going on.
Of course I don't agree, since I prefer my patch... One problem with Frank's patch: the f object is indefinitely incremented.
Marc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Ht/SQdzoeKQ0PccRAgknAKC+SM8N8qI0QiFEEw4awX7MCSkAKgCcCsB6
u2ElADPZOaVniwqO1foJTug=
=2St8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----