I think it would be very good to have cleaned up preferences windows
for Pd in general. They are one of the biggest uability issues in Pd
right now. If someone writes the code, it can easily be included into
Pd-extended. Including it into Pd-vanilla is a different story,
we'll see what happens there.
.hc
On Oct 18, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Thomas O Fredericks wrote:
But isn't this all deprecated? I thought the new official way of
loading externals in Pd-Extended was to either use prefixes or the
import object (which make more sense with the upcoming Pdpedia,
permits the dynamic loading of libs and better follows the standard
import method seen in other programming languages).Now, I bring this up because, if there is not a "standard" way of
using Pd-Extended, it will tend to confuse new users and make
patches incompatible between different use configurations.I could start a html documentation on the particularities of Pd- Extended.
Tom
On 10/18/07, Atte André Jensen atte.jensen@gmail.com wrote: Jamie Bullock wrote:
I have a few ideas about how it might be improved:
How about a checkbox "recurse subdirs" that'll traverse subdirs. I
know this can lead to bad things (wrong load order of files with same
name), but this can also happen with individual dirs.I'd like to split my growing pd instrument collection up into subdirs, but also having to maintain the path's dialog have stopped me so
far...-- peace, love & harmony Atte
http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensen http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
All information should be free. - the hacker ethic