I went to the "latest" folder and downloaded this one:
Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2-macosx104-powerpc.dmg
The build date is 9-May-2007. Is that the one I should have used? Alain
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at Date: 2007/05/09 Wed AM 11:14:37 EDT CC: Pure Data List pd-list@iem.at, gem-dev@iem.at Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] [PD] Gem Compiling os x xcode problems
nosehair911@bellsouth.net wrote:
Thats cool, I think thats an elegant solution. Then I dont get why I still get this message from Gem:
[text2d]: Gem has been compiled without FONT-support !
This is from the latest auto-build (may 9).
which autobuild? currently there are several versions of pd-extended built each night, probably one of them uses the old non-font Gem?
Well I'm still very green at this, hope you can figure it out. I will keep testing the nightly-builds for
font
support. This process has been my first experience with compiling anything. BTW i was able to
get
text support going by including the static library within the Gem build. Gem blew up to 4.2MB, its a fatty but it works for my purposes.
well, that's the joy auf static linking (and that is one of the reasons why on w32 and os-x most apps are so huge, while on linux most of them are tiny)
mfg.adr IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev