13 Mar
2012
13 Mar
'12
5:14 p.m.
On 03/13/2012 07:12 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Though I lack to see the necessity to change [routeOSC]'s current behaviour, I agree that it most likely wouldn't cause any harm.
As I understand it, this topic only came up because apparently the behaviour has been changed in the newest release to not allow list-messages containing OSC-messages as first item anymore, breaking some old patches without any urgent necessity.
IMHO it's really a user mistake to send [list /what/ever 123( to [routeOSC].
this recent change looks more like a (accidental!) bugfix than a regression to me (whether it breaks old code or not.. breaking faulty code should not count, oder? =).
cheers, y
-- yvan.volochine@gmail.com http://yvanvolochine.com