thanks IOhannes, Frank! Both your approaches seem to be solving my problem so far. And mixing the 2 techniques makes possible some interesting operations with abstractions and unique id. I'm trying to build kind of automated/dynamic patcher to create chains of gop abstractions fast and easy. I'll keep you updated...
cheers
M
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:18 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Marco Donnarumma wrote:
If you want a loadbang, you can send a message "loadbang" to
"pd-mypatch",
i.e.:
[; pd-mypatch.pd obj 10 10 myobject; pd-mypatch.pd loadbang(
Ciao
Frank
Thanks Frank, I was already trying to send a loadbang, but the first [instance] has the right id (1), then the following [instance] has id =
3,
the next 6 and so on. Besides also other instances of [instance] with different arguments are affected the same way while sending a loadbang to the parent patch. You can test this in the example patch I sent yesterday. Probably I'm missing something, but I'm struggling to make it work
without
good results.
if you want to send a single bang to a single object the arguments of which you can control (and know) you can do:
[; pd-mypatch.pd obj 10 10 myobject <myuniqid>; <myuniqid>_loadbang bang; (
and them make sure you have a [r $1_loadbang] in your [instance]
madfas IOhannes