i used unicode fonts only if i remember well
a big font exists (cant remember the name) with almost all existing codes implemented
2012/10/7 J Oliver jaime.oliver2@gmail.com:
Indeed pd 0.42-5. One of my old versions.
thanks!
J
Jaime Oliver www.jaimeoliver.pe jo2357@columbia.edu Columbia University
On Oct 7, 2012, at 3:57 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 10/07/2012 06:51 AM, J Oliver wrote:
that's a bit weirder and might well be a bug in Gem.
please send a patch that exhibits this problem.
Attached
your patch is encoded in some ISO-8859 encoding, while Gem expects a UTF-8 encoded string with the "text" message.
this most likely hints, that you are using an older version of Pd (<0.43). one of the biggest things about Pd-0.43 is probably it's full UTF-8 support, which should fix all these problems.
i converted your patch file to UTF-8, and now it works ok: $ iconv -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 accents.pd > accents-UTF8.pd
as another check, i switched my keyboard layout to hebrew and entered the text via a symbolbox and it displayed just fine (though it got the font-direction wrong; but it's probably best to leave bidirectional text handling out of Gem's scope and move that to a separate external).
for those tests i was using the stock debian packages (puredata-0.43.2-4 & gem-0.93.3-5)
fgmadr IOhannes <accents.pd>_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list