i understand that it's not the point, to get a final product like cubase. what is missing though (as far as i know), is a good way to do audio/MIDI/video recording and editing, all the while connecting it up to other parts of your patch. in this way you can sync events with a musical composition or whatever you want to do. it just adds more stuff that you can do. i'm not saying that i'd like a logic copy running under pd, because that's not what i want.
scott
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Josh Steiner wrote:
And if you really wanted to have something that was Cubase or Nuendo, why not just buy that? It is out there and it will most likely have a lot less bugs than anything I would write in PD that tried to emulate it.
check out ardour, its an amazing free application, its getting to the point where its competitive with the big guys:
trying to turn pd into cubase is kind of a dead end and misses the point of pd really. i mean, you should be able to do anything you'd want to within pd, but it will always be utterly different in work flow and general character than dedicated sequencers.
-- ____________________________________________________ independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
"640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates, 1981