Jamie Bullock wrote:
I think a list* data type is a really good idea. I've wanted a feature like this for some time, but don't like using externals in my patches unless I absolutely have to.
I think this is also an important issue. There should be a better way of packaging a patch with the required externals for better transferability. This would make it easier for us all to share. But for all I know you avoid externals for idealogical reasons rather than compatibility.
-ian
I think this is definitely something that
should be built into 'standard' PD, and not require an external.
Just my 2p!
Jamie
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Krzysztof Czaja wrote: However, GridFlow doesn't reconvert nested Ruby Arrays to this parenthese form: it just refuses them. Instead of implementing that feature in GridFlow, I thought Pd could be modified for that, and thus everyone could benefit from that feature without having to have +tot or GF.
I mean this: that what both +tot and GridFlow do is incomplete and potentially slow (because of a need to continually do post-parsing !) and that a complete, non-hack solution is much desirable.
Mathieu Bouchard -=- Montréal QC Canada -=- http://artengine.ca/matju
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list