Erm, im an idiot
it works fine with text, and looks great. sorry for the mis-info.
-dok
On Nov 17, 2003, at 2:41 PM, ben@ekran.org wrote:
Hey there,
You'll have to ask chris about the 2|4|8 thing, I think they are subsampling values?? Higher number means more smooth. The results look great, I'm really looking forward to running Gem on OSX when my laptop comes in.
You say FSAA does not do anything on the text objects?? definatly a gem-dev@iem.at issue.
You can get the CVS help through CVS (see the directions on the sourceforge site for Gem.) otherwise Chris used to have a tarball on the same page as the binaries....
Good luck. Ben
Cool, thanks.
it was the upper case =) and it seems to work fine on OS X. Ive tried it on some patches that use lots of objects (like the tabwrite triangle patch posted a while back..), and it doesnt seem to use significantly more processing power. (if any at all, judging by top).
you can see the diff:
http://homepage.mac.com/doktorp/tri1.jpg before
http://homepage.mac.com/doktorp/tri2.jpg after
after playing with it for a while, it doesnt seem to want to do anything when using text objects though..
also, what is the significance of 21418 ? why that number? curious minds enquire.
On Nov 17, 2003, at 12:48 PM, ben@ekran.org wrote:
There is an extruded text object in CVS, I've not played with it though (but I think there is a help file!)
I dont have the help file, anyone care to let me in on its secrets? (besides guessing the obvious)
Thanks again
-dok