Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
the attached patch shows that the subpatch is [switch~]ed off too early, but not [switch~]ed on too late.
So for tight timing switching on has to be done at least one block *in advance*.
if i interprete correctly, what your patch is telling me, then one would have to switch *off* one block *later*. it wouldn't be necessary to know in advance, when to switch on, though. it seems like it is enough to add 1.5ms to each [delay] that schedules the switch-off-messages.
Ah, yes, you're right: I didn't interpret the patch correctly. Attached is another version which allows to test different delay times and also lets you compare a switched off with a non-switched signal. It shows, that timing is indeed no problem when switching off subpatches, which is good news to me.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__