On Dec 12, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The right inlet serves as the loadbang. You need to use the
right inlet instead of regular [loadbang]sCould this be changed so that it uses the ordinary [loadbang] ? If
you have a canvas to send messages to, you can send it a "loadbang"
message, which will trigger all the [loadbang]s in the canvas. Is there a
reason why the canvas can't be reached (or can't be reached
individually), and could this be circumvented easily?It is just there for backwards compatibility. I only reworked nqpoly4 to make it look nicer and to make further development easier. The [polypoly] abstraction that I derived from nqpoly4 doesn't need the loadbang-inlet anymore, it sends a "loadbang"-message after dynamically filling the subpatch, which, as you wrote, loadbangs all objects inside that subpatch just fine.
Since you've now written another, do you think there is a possibility
of making a nqpoly "kernel" for making poly systems with different
functionality, like the auto-[switch~] version, the instance manager
version, etc.
What I do a lot of is making a patch, then controlling many copies of
it, so I plan on making a version of nqpoly4 that works well in that
situation.
.hc
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin