Ok, I'd like to propose a "patch-off."
What's the cleanest, clearest way to present adsr.pd from the audio tutorials?
I choose this patch because there are lots of crossed wires, plus one has to leave space for the explanatory comments of the patch.
Here are two versions I could think of.
-Jonathan
--- On Fri, 3/20/09, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
From: Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca Subject: Re: [PD] style guide idea: [send foo] versus [; foo( To: "Frank Barknecht" fbar@footils.org Cc: pd-list@iem.at Date: Friday, March 20, 2009, 9:05 PM On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:
For example I'd rather start with making people
properly left-align their patches and avoid crossing patch cords
well, I do my best to reduce the number of crossings, but if I have to avoid crossings completely, I'll just avoid Pd...
Pd doesn't make it easy to avoid crossings.
Not all crossings are even bad. Crossings that are ambiguous-looking are very bad. Too many crossings in the same area is bad, except if the crossings are very regular-looking (a line crossing a bunch of parallel lines is more orderly than a line crossing a bunch of random-angled lines).
_____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list