Yep, thanks for catching the numbering problem - I've fixed that now.
I'm not sure what to do about mixiung messages and signals in the same inlet - that migth turn out not to be possible to allow. I could hack in a "vis" message inlet in case there are no inlets at all though... will think about that.
cheers Miller
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:59:43PM +0200, Pierre Guillot wrote:
Hi, The clone is really great ! I think there is a bug, the two first copies seem to have the instance number 0. And if the first inlet in the abstraction is a signal inlet, you can't use it to pass message to the object (like vis). I think this is because the clone uses the flag "CLASS_NOINLET" but perhaps that even if the abstraction doesn't have any inlet, the clone object could have a minimum of 1 inlet (just to use the visible message). Anyway thanks !
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list