ok, i will do the following:
can think of (hey, without you this wouldnt even be possible, so thnx for these great softs)
btw. 1000x thanx @ iohannes for compiling gem 0.87 for windo$e !!! bug? sometimes there's no rendering, and i have to restart pd+gem before it works again (don't get any errors, the gemWindow just stays black...)
-andre ps. i'm very busy at the moment... so this has to wait...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Barknecht" barknech@ph-cip.uni-koeln.de To: "PD-LiST" pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [PD] 3 questions regarding PD
Andre Schmidt hat gesagt: // Andre Schmidt wrote:
i'm working on a 1 file zip/installer of pd+gem+framestein+other usefull
for
VJs... but i'm still waiting answers from the developers if i may do that... i'm (because of size) NOT including the sources!
i got green light for framestein 2 do that...
PD? GEM? ZEXY? GRID?
I think, it would be ok, if they have an open source license, and they have. You can of course redistribute them. I'm not sure, what's with the sources. If you change them, you will have to distribute your changes,
but
if you didn't change them, IMO it would be ok to just give the binaries.
If
someone asks you for the sources, you must make them available to them,
but
probably a link to the original sources would be enough. But I'm no
lawyer.
In fact, I do distribute binary-only Debian packages of PD on my website, because I didn't have enough space for the sources as well. So I only linked to Miller's page. So far nobody has complained, and nobody did want the sources from me. I could and would give them, of course.
Ah, now I remember, I did change s_linux.c to use "alsa/asoundlib.h". Now
I
will have to publish the sources, d*mn! ;)
Ciao,
__ __
Frank Barknecht ____ ______ ____ __ trip\ \ / /wire ______ / __// __ /__/ __// // __ \ / / __ \ ___
/ / / ____/ / / / // ____// /\ \ ___\____
/_/ /_____/ /_/ /_//_____// / \ \_____\_____
/_/ _\