Hi all,
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 13:43 +0100, Peter Plessas wrote:
Dear Frank, List
thanks for that help! Yes indeed it works and i have been able of doing it with less objects and the help of bang~ as well. There is one thing i still don't get: I always thought pd would try to execute non-signal messages inbetween audio blocks. And for two messages this would be the same interval unless Pd had too many messages to calculate and defers them after the next audio block. But the writesf~ example shows that this is not necessarily the case.
i am sorry for being too lazy to test myself, butwhat is the actual result of this? does [writesf~] start recording between block boundaries? or does it stop recording between boundaries? or is there another reason for being forced to use [bang~]?
i somehow assumed, that [writesf~] doesn't use scheduled messages...
I always thought that Pd would execute messages in between audio blocks. So if i sent two messages (stop old file, start new file), i expected them to happen in a gap between two blocks, hence gapless recorded files possible. Franks demonstration shows that i have to explicitly time those messages according to a block~ (or equivalent) in order to get this behavior. Still all blurry to me, let's look on!
regards, PP
roman
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de