29 Jan
2014
29 Jan
'14
5:01 p.m.
Dear List,
not sure if I am getting something wrong here, but it seems that sending the message
; cosinesum array999 1
does something different (besides an obvious phase shift between sine and cosine functions) to the resulting contents of that table:
the first partial on cosinesum seems to be the DC component, while the first partial in sinesum is the, well, first partial.
Accordingly, the second partials have double frequency in sinesum as in cosinesum.
Perhaps this is intentional, but was just wondering...
best, Peter