3 Jun
2002
3 Jun
'02
1:04 p.m.
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, IOhannes zmoelnig wrote:
i really didn't want to say that one would be "better" than the other. it gave me (literally) sleepless nights to decide, which version i should take, seeing the need of a signal->pixel converter.
mhmm, finally there are more methods of doing this, like having painted waveforms etc, so there is probably a need for several of signal to pixel converters.
I am going to rename the sig2pix to "pix_scrollsig~", in order to not confuse ppl.
since i thought more of image-processing than of visualization it turned out to be a synced version.
i thought one would be able to acchieve the scrolling via the overlap
great, but how do you do that ?
Guenter