On Sep 9, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, ydegoyon@free.fr hat gesagt: // ydegoyon@free.fr wrote:
we have namespace prefixes for that, no?
i don't trust namespaces and that everybody knows how to use it correctly
And namespaces don't really work well for binary objects (externals) yet.
AFAIK, they work well for Pd objects and binary objects. The only
difference I know of is that with binaries, if you load and object
with the namespace prefix, then it will also claim the class name
without the prefix, i.e. using [maxlib/change] will claim [change] as
well. That doesn't happen with objects written in Pd.
anyway I'll think to a more self-explicative name...
editmatrix seems a good candidate...
can i suggest the name of 'tracker' ?
What about "numgrid"?
But yes, just because there are namespaces, does not mean that you
should give generic names to your objects. Objects should still have
names that describe their function well and are hopefully unique.
.hc
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin