25 Aug
2008
25 Aug
'08
5:25 p.m.
Hallo, zmoelnig@iem.at hat gesagt: // zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
however, since i am currently planning to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, which would allow you define the behaviour as you like
it, i don't want to add complexity to the current implementation. don't know when this will be implemented yet, but it is rather high on
my todo list.
And of course one could do a little wrapper [gemhead-off] immediatly for this. Or even wrap the whole double gemhead into an abstraction as attached.
Ciao
Frank