Just to further confirm, pd-l2ork is not affected with Benjamins example either. Hopefully this will help Hans and others hunt this thing down.
Best wishes,
Ico
From: pd-list-bounces@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at] On Behalf Of Hans-Christoph Steiner Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:35 PM To: benjah@free.fr Cc: Pd List Subject: Re: [PD] found how to reproduce Pd-ext 0.43.4 Tcl Invalid Command Name error
That bug is not related, though I might look similar. Any time you see things like .x2415b0 those are the unique IDs that Pd uses for each Window in the GUI. ".x2415b0: no such object" basically means that Pd is trying to send a command to a window in the GUI, but that window does not currently exist (like it was closed) and Pd didn't get the message about that window closing.
This patch is a nice clear example, so it should be possible to track the bug down. Marco, if you haven't already, can you add that patch tarball to a bug report in the tracker? A reference to this thread would also be helpful.
.hc
On Mar 7, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Benjamin ~ 01xy wrote:
Hello,
I encountered a maybe similar bug clicking on the 0 button of the Hradio in pix_video help patch :
(Tcl) NOM DE COMMANDE INVALIDE : invalid command name ".x8b1b038.c" while executing ".x8b1b038.c delete 8b26df8BASE0" ("uplevel" body line 14) invoked from within "uplevel #0 $cmds_from_pd"
In Pd-extended 0.43-4 on debian 32 bit with GEM: ver: 0.93.3 compiled: Jan 28 2013
this bug disapear if I cut the wire of the left outlet of [pix_video] which goes to [s $0-info]
Bugs related ? : http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3522945&group_id=5 5736&atid=478070 &aid=3522945&group_id=55736&atid=478070
++Benjamin
Le 07/03/2013 12:33, Marco Donnarumma a écrit :
hey thanks all for testing.
At least we know it's consistent. Let's see if somebody has ideas about it.
Let me know how can I help! Really wish to solve this.
thanks!
-- Marco Donnarumma New Media + Sonic Arts Practitioner, Performer, Teacher, Director. Embodied Audio-Visual Interaction Research Team. Department of Computing, Goldsmiths University of London
Portfolio: http://marcodonnarumma.com <http://marcodonnarumma.com/>
Research: http://res.marcodonnarumma.com <http://res.marcodonnarumma.com/>
Director: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net
<http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net/>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:15 AM, batinste <dwanafite@yahoo.fr> wrote:
Hi
Behaviour confirmed on ubuntu 12.10 64 bits and pd-ext 0.43.4.
On 07/03/2013 02:02, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
hey,
dunno if you remember, but I still have this error (below) and now I managed
to make a small patch that reproduces it (attached).
It seems related to the <Hide> flag for a 2nd level nested GOP patch.
it'd be great if somebody could test it on linux and mac.
I'm on Ubuntu Lucid 10.04, pd-ext 0.43.4
how to reproduce:
- launch MAIN-graph-bug.pd
- click the bang to open a subpatch (if it doesn't at startup)
- close the subpatch
- close MAIN-graph-bug.pd
at this point Pd throws the error as below. Only the GUI freezes, the patch
is unusable and have to kill it, by closing pd.
\\\\\\\\\\\\ <smb://>
(Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".x996ebd0.c"
while executing
".x996ebd0.c delete graph996f4b0i0"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 $cmds_from_pd"
\\\\\\\\\\\\ <smb://>
How to avoid it:
- launch MAIN-graph-bug.pd
- click the bang to open a subpatch (if it doesn't at startup)
- open the subpatch
- open the further subpatch <anlz.scope~>
- flag hide object name and argument
- save
-close pd
- restart the patch and the error disappear
It is worth noting that the error I get with the Xth Sense software looks
similar but has different tags (see below). And I can't reproduce this one
error using a subpatch including a graph or iem_image (which I use in the
Xth Sense)
\\\\\\\\\\\\ <smb://>
(Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".x9c4d3b0.c"
while executing
".x9c4d3b0.c create image 900 776 -image a4304c0PHOTOIMAGE -tags
a4304c0PHOTO
("uplevel" body line 283)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 $cmds_from_pd"
\\\\\\\\\\\\\ <smb://>
should i submit a different bug report or add to the one I did already?
thanks in advance for any hint,
this is forcing me to still use pd-ext 0.42.5 during my workshop, which is a
shame :)
--
Marco Donnarumma
New Media + Sonic Arts Practitioner, Performer, Teacher, Director.
Embodied Audio-Visual Interaction Research Team.
Department of Computing, Goldsmiths University of London
Portfolio: http://marcodonnarumma.com http://marcodonnarumma.com/ Research: http://res.marcodonnarumma.com http://res.marcodonnarumma.com/ Director: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net/
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list