Both Pd-extended auto-builds should work, so please report on either/ both.
I am also seeing problems. If I manually run "make gem" it seems to
work, but not as an auto-build... arg.
.hc
On May 9, 2007, at 11:15 AM, nosehair911@bellsouth.net wrote:
I went to the "latest" folder and downloaded this one:
Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2-macosx104-powerpc.dmg
The build date is 9-May-2007. Is that the one I should have used? Alain
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at Date: 2007/05/09 Wed AM 11:14:37 EDT CC: Pure Data List pd-list@iem.at, gem-dev@iem.at Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] [PD] Gem Compiling os x xcode problems
nosehair911@bellsouth.net wrote:
Thats cool, I think thats an elegant solution. Then I dont get
why I still get this message from Gem:[text2d]: Gem has been compiled without FONT-support !
This is from the latest auto-build (may 9).
which autobuild? currently there are several versions of pd-extended built each night, probably one of them uses the old non-font Gem?
Well I'm still very green at this, hope you can figure it out. I
will keep testing the nightly-builds forfont
support. This process has been my first experience with
compiling anything. BTW i was able toget
text support going by including the static library within the Gem
build. Gem blew up to 4.2MB, its a fatty but it works for my purposes.well, that's the joy auf static linking (and that is one of the
reasons why on w32 and os-x most apps are so huge, while on linux most of
them are tiny)mfg.adr IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic.
It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and
expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war
on terrorism. - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom