----- Original Message -----
From: Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [PD] dsp graph question
Le 2012-03-01 à 12:02:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
And is it possible to make local symbol tables that are separate from the
global symbol table?
Look into my proposals that I wrote back in 2006 or so, probably on pd-dev. But I don't think I got any replies on them at all.
Oh interesting-- there's an entire thread on namespaces for send/receive. Never noticed that before.
From 2006 all I see is some stuff about deallocatable symbols-- is that what you're referring to?
Additionally, if an array of scalars only send the signal to the [struct]
signal outlet and don't interact with each other (through [send~], [throw~], [etc.~]), could one could use [setsize] to to do massive polyphony without having to rebuild the entire graph?
DSP graphs allow dsp-methods to call dsp_add with all sorts of very context-specific arguments such as direct pointers to the internals of tables and of delwrite~ and such. To make those into context-independent things would require a lot of work. But you don't necessarily need to do that if all you want is just to avoid most of the recompilation whenever you add or remove a few abstraction instances at any given moment.
Yes that's pretty much all I want to do.
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC