16 Mar
2008
16 Mar
'08
3:45 a.m.
hi miller, not exaclty sure what sub-64-sample message delays means? block~ 64 64? or 64 delays each 0.0226757369615 ms. will test this. marius.
Miller Puckette wrote:
You can do it combining bang~ with sub-64-sample message delays.
cheers M
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:05:46PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
hi, is there an alternative for bang~ that will work with blocksizes smaller than 64 samples? or is there a chance to fix bang~? marius.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list