Quoting Andy Farnell padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:58:31 +0100 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org wrote:
Hallo, Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:04:52 +0000 errordeveloper@gmail.com wrote:
what is the difference between r~/s~ and throw~/catch~ ?
[r~][s~] are one to one
Thankyou Frank. Remember we talked about problems that happen
i vaguely remember your post about this problem.... i also vaguely remember that i could not reproduce the problem.
using more than one [r~]. Was that to do with creation order?
one-to-many means that you can use more than one [r~]. i do this often.
it has nothing to do with creation order, the s~/r~ names are
evaluated when you turn on the audio-engine. not at creation time.
Or is that something that only affects [throw~][catch~] pairs?
neither. the throw~/catch~ names are evaluated when you turn on the
audio-engine. not at creation time.
the only time you can get into trouble is when you are doing dynamic
patching while the audio engine is on (then you can have
evaluation-time == creation-time and you will get a warning if there
is no [send~] or no [catch~] yet)
and if you want to do many-to-many, just use: | | | [throw~ bla] [throw~ bla] [throw~ bla]
[catch~ bla] | [send~ bla]
[r~ bla] [r~ bla] | |
mfg.ar IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.