HI IOhannes,
thanks, yes, I found the difference! I think I was trying to wrap around the length of the loop instead of the length of the table (for some reason or another...). The patch you sent does exactly what I set out to do, and essentially is only different in this way. So it wasn't [wrap~], but how I was using it.
danke! d.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
or to put it in your own words: try and find the difference...