I forgot one thing, in my patch ctlin.pd with the [+] object the bang is not necessary, it even adds some wrong numbers, I just swaped the the incoming parameters and it makes what I want but a dedicated inlet for the bang would be more user friendly... to me. But I give up trying to create the dynamic stuff, it is way too complicated for me to add a simple variable to an object, I'll do the math myself as you suggested Derek, it's going to take a long time but not as long as what I spent today on this stuff. And doing a long and repetitive task by hand is not really what I thought pd was about.
thanks for your help
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
How's this? Probably pretty inefficient way to do it, but it works. The test inputs are for if you have a MIDI loop, where output comes back as input to Pd. Otherwise use whatever cc sending device you normally use to check it. I'm sure there's a simpler way... anyone? ctlhouse.pd is the file to open.
-Chuckk
On 7/29/06, derek holzer derek@x-i.net wrote:
If you really wanted to dynamically create this abstraction, which would automatically create the LSB channel of the control in message, you could create another abstraction within the abstraction, and add 32 to the channel number in the first-level abstraction which would pass it as a creation argument to the inner-most abstraction.