23 Nov
2003
23 Nov
'03
11:29 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 04:52:14PM -0500, Larry Troxler wrote:
Really? It says that for you? To me, it says that C++ adds some overhead (not quite the right word) which, if you were coding in C, you would have to add anyway.
It says that to do the same in C than in C++, it's necessary to add what's missing in C. But it also says that C++ always call destructors even when not necessary, and that there's ways to reduce this overhead. C++ can certainly be as effective, fast, etc, than C, if programs are carefully coded. We're not disagreeing. Peace and joy to C++ coders of the universe. -- Marc