On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:25 PM, marius schebella wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 1:31 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Luke Iannini hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini wrote:
There are some amazing sets of abstractions being released
recently, which has served to highlight the many extant styles of
patching. I was wondering if there was interest in establishing a set of guidelines for patching in the vein of PEP 8 for Python; I've found that document to be very relaxing as it is a standardized
approach to OCD. More seriously, it greatly helps when reading other people's code or collaborating. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/I think, it would be important to first collect every possible style element in the wild and document what people are using in reality. That would be interesting. I'm not too much in favour of a style
"guide" however. Let people be creative.Nobody is talking about requirements. If you don't like style
guides, don't use them. But it is really not useful to squelch
other people's efforts, especially when you don't even have an
intention of using this stuff.I actually liked frank's idea to collect different people's ideas
and compare them. maybe there is some common sense in all of them? marius.
Yeah, I think that was Luke's idea from the beginning. I agree that
it is a good one.
.hc
Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic