From: katja katjavetter@gmail.com To: Phil Stone pkstone@ucdavis.edu Cc: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com; pd-list Pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency
Yeah, sending FUDI would be good. Or OSC. In case of synthesis, better send controller data instead of audio.
In my case (sending processed acoustic audio input) that wouldn't work, but never mind.
Btw-- are you sending compressed or uncompressed audio?
Katja
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Phil Stone pkstone@ucdavis.edu wrote:
That's a fairly brilliant idea. No need for fancy audio-quality wireless units, either.
Phil
On 4/26/13 1:19 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
From: katja katjavetter@gmail.com To: "onyx@onyx-ashanti.com" onyxashanti@gmail.com Cc: pd-list Pd-list@iem.at; Martin Peach martin.peach@sympatico.ca Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency
Hi Onyx,
What is your aim, do you want to entertain your (physically present) audience via smart phones instead of PA system?
I have a similar quest pending: to send Pd audio from a wearable computer over wireless to PA system.
Why not send FUDI to a box connected directly to the PA system?
-Jonathan
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list