On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, carmen wrote:
On Tue Aug 01, 2006 at 08:08:33PM -0700, thewade wrote:
W00T! Thanks GG!
agreed. definitely one of the cooler patches to show up on the tracker in a long time ;)
are arrays the only thing (including externals) that assume sizeof t_word == t_pointer == long == t_float?
I assume, but I don' t really know. I am not actively using my 64 bit machine anymore, because it is a bit old and slow (533Mhz and terribly small cache).
I assume that externals that deal with arrays have in general the same problem as the pd builtin objects.
altho table is certainly the most obvious thing to notice, pd seemed pretty unstable on 64bit, perhaps stack corruption or something..
mhm, might be that some of the datastructure stuff has problems. If you say unstable you mean crashing right ? Would be interesting if this is a problem of pd itself or some externals. If you are going to do tests, maybe you can start pd inside gdb and do a "bt".
Now I just need to find a week so I can reainstall everything again,
this time in 64-bit mode..
Yeah, I recommend to do that on an extra hard drive/partition. There might still be some problems left.
Günter
Thanks for the efforts! Much appreciated
ditto!
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list