HI
I personally would love to keep on working mainly with Gem and controling video/pictures and stuff like that by audio signals.The main issue why I was asking is because I didn't find too much info about Gem in particular in combination with MacOSX on the internet. I had no clue about the performance on this OS in general. Thanks a lot for giving me so many interesting information.
Thomas ___________________________________________________ Leave the house before you find something worth staying in for.
From: Max Neupert abonnements@revolwear.com To: "B. Bogart" ben@ekran.org CC: Thomas Kronlachner heartofoak456@hotmail.com, pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] IntelMacs & PD/GEM Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:34:44 +0100
Am 17.01.2006 um 17:36 schrieb B. Bogart:
hi Thomas,
I run PD/Gem on both linux and MAC machines. (no mactel)
Gem seems a lot more efficient for video on OSX, this is probably due to the very nice (proprietary) video decoders and quicktime making it all integrated. (and the developers being very adept at optimizing for the MAC platform).
maybe the text on the gem website should be altered then: Quote:
GEM was originally written by Mark Danks to do realtime openGL-based
graphics on SGI and Win32 platforms.Günter Geiger made a port to LINUX.
GEM is now maintained at the IEM by IOhannes m zmölnig. Future
developments will be aimed at Linux and Win32 platforms.GEM is open source software, it is free for any use and can be downloaded from the internet. GEM runs on Win32, IRIX and LINUX platforms. There is also an experimental port to MAC-OSX.
ÂTHERE IS ALSO AN EXPERIMENTAL PORT TO MAC-OSXÂ
does not quite sound like what you described. actually it scared me from using Gem quite a bit, until franz of the sat told me that it's not true.
max
Still without making lots of efforts audio in PD (with a crappy internal card) seems terrible, the GUI causing dropouts and all kinds of heck, this does not seem to happen under linux. (with a crappy sounds card).
So I guess it depends on what you want to do with it, video or more 3D graphics, still images or video processing...
Personally I do performances on the g4 laptop, which has treated me well, and installations on linux. One day I'll have to give back this g4 and then I guess I'll be doing everything on linux...
Now if someone made linux video decoders perform as well as the OSX ones, and GEM was full of as much SIMD (or SSE, or whatever its called) on linux as the OSX version is I think they would be pretty equal.
.b.
Thomas Kronlachner wrote:
Hi All,
This is my first post here on this list. So I've been working with pd/gem for half a year now. I am very focused on gem in combination with video/audio. I always had the restriction of my hardware, my computer was not powerful enough. so I tend to get a new one. My intention is to by one new IntelMacs. since I really want to get hold of an computer that can handle this I intened to go for this plattform. So I do have a couple of questions:
do you think that there is a future for pd/gem on this plattform?
How was the overall performance of PD/GEM on a mac in general.
What are your expectations or estimations on this issue?
Since this is really something that is decission making for me, I would be happy for any replies.
Thomas
Leave the house before you find something worth staying in for. (Banksy)
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list