On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 17:03 +0100, Matteo.sistisette wrote:
anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually
the
same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when
you
plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff
OR when the patch that will receive the message is not the same one (or a subpatch of the one) in which you generate the message; that is, if "$0" evaluates to different values in the two contexts. This is possible, isn't it? This wouldn't necessarily involve saving....
yes, you are rught. i didn't think of that.
However, I think an escaping mecanism (at least for $'s in messages) would indeed be vital. WHENEVER a special character exists, an escape character should exist, just in case.
yeah, i agree, some escaping mechanism would make a lot things much easier in pd.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de