On 5/10/23 21:51, John Harrison wrote:
Is Gem for Apple Silicon on anybody's radar? I'm up for being part of a team to get Gem on Apple Silicon if there's interest.
just for the record: since yesterday there's snapshot builds of Gem available on deken.
release. things might be more broken then in a normal release (on the upside: if you report bug, they are fixed faster than in a normal release)
updated whenever a i change something in the git repository. there is no turning back (if things worked with yesterday's snapshot, but not with the one downloaded today, then you are out of luck)
least on "Big Sur" (i've tested them[*] on Catalina/amd64 and Monterey/M1)
binaries, there are no dependencies included. I do advise Linux people to just build Gem themselves (or use a distribution that offers packages for Gem's git snapshots). this is because on Linux you typically have a proper package manager (that allows you to easily install all the stuff needed, starting with a compiler), whereas on macOS/Windows you don't (unless you count the variants of "app stores" - which I don't). the pre-built binaries will most likely not work out of the box on your system. (having said that: the binaries where produced on a Debian/bullseye system, so if you are running something similar it should be possible to just install the missing dependencies with your package manager; a good start is to just install the "gem" package that comes with your distribution, as this should pull in most dependencies)
gfds IOhannes
[*] "testing" means a casual check of whether things work on some random snapshot. there are no formal tests verifying the integrity of the deken packages, so: what has probably worked yesterday, might not work today.