watch this! it is the official lame-check from MPlayer - is this normal? never dared to read a machine-produced configure script, yet maybe this one is even written by hand
# mencoder requires (optional) those libs: libmp3lame and divx4linux encore if test "$_mencoder" != no ; then
echocheck "libmp3lame (for mencoder)"
_mp3lame=no
cat > $TMPC <<EOF
#include <lame/lame.h>
int main(void) { lame_version_t
lv; (void) lame_init(); get_lame_version_numerical(&lv); printf("%d%d\n",lv.major,lv.minor); return
0; }
EOF
# Note: libmp3lame usually depends on vorbis
cc_check -lmp3lame $_ld_vorbis -lm &&
_mp3lame=yes
if test "$_mp3lame" = yes ; then
_def_mp3lame="#define HAVE_MP3LAME $TMPO"
_ld_mp3lame="-lmp3lame $_ld_vorbis"
else
_def_mp3lame='#undef HAVE_MP3LAME'
fi
echores "$_mp3lame"
c'est ca
martin
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Yves Degoyon wrote:
ok, i got your config.log and the real reason for this error is :
configure:4124: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lmp3lame -ldl -lz -lbz2 >&5 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.3/../../../libmp3lame.so: undefined reference to `pow'
so, it seems the following macro : AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame, InitMP3, , AC_MSG_ERROR(streaming requires lame library!!))
forgets to link with -lm, i really don't know how to fix this on my side.
Yves Degoyon wrote:
so, i'm puzzled with the behaviour of configure on debian !!
well, you can comment the line, but it's perfectly valid on any other distributions ( i had a redhat at first, but now it evolved to something, hum, else ... )) )
220hex wrote:
yes:
ldconfig -v|grep lame libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
.gif
Wednesday February 26 2003 16:45, skrev Yves Degoyon:
is the location where it is installed is included in /etc/ld.so.conf ??
does a 'ldconfig -v' includes the lame libraries ??
220hex wrote:
I reinstalled lame and libmp3lame from the source package, so here's what I've got:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 376246 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 668 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2003-02-26 01:11 libmp3lame.so -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2003-02-25 23:47 libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 347012 2003-02-25 23:47 libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
still not recognised from .configure...
.gif
Wednesday February 26 2003 15:36, skrev Yves Degoyon:
surely true !! tom !!
but that's really silly from debian.
cheers,
sevy/yves
Tom Schouten wrote:
>>for the lame issue, i think it doesn't find >>libmp3lame which must be in a weird location >>on debian (( >> >>can't help you more from that distance ) >> >maybe it has something to do with the fact that on debian, the >libmp3lame package has only static libararies? > >-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 352520 Aug 16 2001 libmp3lame.a >-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 668 Aug 16 2001 libmp3lame.la > > > >maybe AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame) does not include statics? >
martin pi
http://attacksyour.net/pi
www.machfeld.net